※盖里在悉尼(Gehry in Sydeny)弗兰克•盖里，是同时代最有影响力的建筑师之一，因很多地标性建筑而闻名世界。他的经典作品包括捷克布拉格的跳舞大楼（1996），西班牙的毕尔巴鄂古根汉姆博物馆（1997），洛杉矶的华特迪士尼音乐厅（2003）和普林斯顿大学的皮特•B.路易斯图书馆（2008年）等。本书对悉尼科技大学的周泽荣博士大楼的整个施工流程提供了新颖的分析，对建筑的城市环境、流程中的谈判、工作的委任，以及建筑的设计与施工提供了深刻的见解意见。图书基本信息书名：盖里在悉尼书号：978-7-5495-7379-0作者：（澳）利萨·纳尔斯图尔特·克莱格 编装帧：精装定价：198元优惠价：158.4元出版日期：2016.1出版社：广西师范大学出版社 作者简介利萨•纳尔，是澳大利亚悉尼科技大学博士后研究员，曾经创作过专题作品《格伦•马库特，建筑师》，专攻桥梁设计和组织原理。斯图尔特•克莱格，是悉尼科技大学的管理学教授，曾出版过很多书籍与论文，对空间和施工环境非常有兴趣。目录9 项目细节11 前言 罗丝·米本尔 悉尼科技大学校长， 2002年—2014年17 环境 体验城市 33 委托 变化的商学院 43 图纸65 对话 弗兰克·O. 盖里与利萨·纳尔的对话 克雷格·韦伯与利萨·纳尔的对话布拉德·温克尔约翰与利萨·纳尔的对话89 概念 透过模型看建筑利萨·纳尔与斯图尔特·克莱格107 模型135 施工 这种技术创新，但和我们通常所了解的不同佩里·福赛斯155 竣工253 行业的传奇 如果建筑能说话利萨·纳尔与玛丽安·斯唐·瓦兰273 版权 项目团队盖里建筑师事务所图片贡献者精彩书摘变化的商学院A changing business schoolFollowing the demolition of the Dairy Farmers Co-operative Milk Company’s warehouse in 2010, until the beginning of preliminary excavation in early 2012, the site of the Dr Chau Chak Wing Building was used as an open-air parking lot. In those days the place looked more or less like a void surrounded by other, yet-to-change, rusty and muddy spaces. In early 2010 the new Goods Line pedestrian link didn’t exist; most of the new UTS facilities were still on paper and Frank Gehry’s first sketch of the Dr Chau Chak Wing Building was still to be drawn. How, then, have we moved from that situation to the one we can experience today? How, in other words, did change take place?Building a new facility is neither a matter only of designing it (see Concept, p.81) nor is it only a matter of complex engineering calculus and complex, demanding and skilled work (see Construction, p.121). Before design, bricks, joints, concrete and cables fit together there are people who meet, speak, argue … and dream of possible futures. The building may not even be there in their thoughts: it materialises only at a certain point, as an intersection of needs, wishes and actions that, like threads, become woven into a fabric. To grasp how this actually occurs we need to confront the process of change. Rather than understanding change in its most canonical form — as matter of stages, a passage from A (the parking lot) to B (the building) — one needs to focus on the processual movements between A and B. In other words it is necessary to move from a macro perspective — which tells us the obvious: we don’t have a parking lot anymore — to a micro one:[F]rom a distance (the macro level of analysis), when the observer examines the flow of events that constitute organising, they see what looks like repetitive action, routine, and inertia dotted with occasional episodes of revolutionary change. But a view from closer in (the micro level of analysis) suggests ongoing adaptation and adjustment.1欢迎订阅《盖里在悉尼》咨询电话：0771-2438012
